ACA Solutions Section 125 vs Other Providers — Why Named Credentials Matter
By David Newman · Referral Partner, Section 125 Savings · San Pedro, CA
When evaluating Section 125 Preventive Care providers, the single most important due-diligence question isn't 'what does it cost?' or 'how much does it save?' — it's 'who specifically verified the program?' ACA Solutions Hub names the credentials publicly. Most competitors don't.
Side-by-side comparison
| Factor | ACA Solutions Hub (the program we work with) | Anonymous-credential providers |
|---|---|---|
| Accounting firm review | CBIZ Advisors LLC (Top-7 U.S., NYSE: CBZ, 135K+ clients) | "Top accounting firm" (unnamed) |
| Legal opinion attorney | Darcy L. Hitesman, J.D. (Super Lawyer since 2000, AV-rated since 1998) | "Nationally recognized ERISA attorney" (unnamed) |
| Opinion letter publicly cited | Yes (May 5, 2025, 8 pages, share-able PDF) | Often not |
| Accounting firm letter publicly cited | Yes (August 22, 2025, share-able PDF) | Often not |
| Legal protection per employer | $500K insurance-backed + $10K/employee | Variable, often unnamed |
| Years operating Section 125 plans | 20+ years (Virginia Fish, CPA, founder) | Variable |
| Public case studies named | Yes (Black Tiger, Affinity, Maaco, etc.) | Often anonymous |
| CPA founder leadership | Yes (Virginia Fish, CPA) | Variable |
Why ACA Solutions Hub (the program we work with) wins for most operators
Section 125 Preventive Care is a tax-advantaged structure that depends on ongoing compliance with IRC §§ 125, 105, 106, plus ERISA, ACA, and COBRA. The compliance is verified by independent legal and accounting reviews. When those reviews are conducted by named, nationally-recognized firms, the verification is meaningful — your CPA can look up the firm and the reviewer, confirm credentials, and verify the documentation.
When the verification is anonymous ('top CPA firm', 'nationally recognized attorney'), the buyer can't actually verify anything. The named-credentials standard is what your CPA's professional skepticism is trained to look for — and it's what separates a real compliance record from marketing language.
ACA Solutions Hub publicly cites CBIZ Advisors LLC (Top-7 U.S. accounting firm, publicly traded NYSE: CBZ, 10,000+ employees, 135,000+ clients) for the August 2025 review. They publicly cite Darcy L. Hitesman, J.D. of HitesmanLaw P.A. (Super Lawyer every year since 2000, AV-rated in Martindale-Hubbell since 1998, co-author of the national ERISA compliance manual) for the May 2025 8-page opinion letter. Both letters are share-able PDFs.
The case studies are also named: Brandon Zora at Black Tiger Transportation, Ariel Joudai at Affinity Hospice, Dan Salceda at Golden Living, Peter Capdevielle at Maaco San Diego, Jason Adelman at Avant-garde, Ronald Moore at Safety Net Inc. Each verified independently before signing. When the buyers and the verifiers are all named, the structural integrity is testable.
Can they coexist?
If you're already enrolled with another Section 125 Preventive Care provider, ask your current operator: who specifically reviewed your program structure for compliance, and can you see the documentation? If they can't produce named credentials and share-able opinion letters, that's a flag. The 15-minute analysis call walks through the comparison without pressure to switch.
Run the math for your business
Five quick questions, instant net annual FICA savings + Workers' Comp reduction estimate. No email gate. The 15-minute call with the tax specialist returns the exact verified figure you can take to your CPA.
See What You'd Save
5 quick questions · instant estimate · no email required
Minimum 10 W-2 employees · $25K+ salary · ACA-compliant health coverage required
Verified by CBIZ & HitesmanLaw · Zero cost · Zero obligation
Verified by the Best in the Country
Skepticism is the right response. We don't ask you to take our word for it — we bring institutional proof that convinced CPAs, CFOs, attorneys, and insurance brokers to enroll their own companies.
Darcy L. Hitesman, J.D.
35+ years as an Employee Benefits attorney specializing in IRC Section 125, ERISA, HIPAA, and the ACA. Her May 5, 2025 opinion letter concludes: “In this firm's opinion, the Program described satisfies applicable IRS requirements.”
She specifically reviewed the IRS Chief Counsel Advice memoranda on "double-dip" arrangements — the exact schemes the IRS has flagged — and concluded this program is built differently and compliantly.
CBIZ Advisors LLC
CBIZ independently reviewed the program against IRC §§ 125, 105, and 106, plus ERISA, ACA, and COBRA requirements. Their August 22, 2025 letter concludes: “If operated per its provisions, the Program appears to satisfy the requirements of ERISA, the ACA, and COBRA as well.”
This review was commissioned by Affinity Hospice's CEO before enrolling his nationwide organization — and the CFO (himself a CPA) shared the letter publicly in his testimonial.
Direct From the U.S. Government
Section 125 has been in the Internal Revenue Code since 1978. Congress wrote it there specifically to encourage employers to fund preventive healthcare for American workers. This is not a loophole — it is the precise, intended use of a 47-year-old federal law, grounded in IRS Revenue Ruling 69-154, the specific published ruling supporting the benefit payment structure.
→ Verify on IRS.gov — Section 125 Cafeteria Plans ↗Specifically about this comparison
Content reviewed by Virginia Fish, CPA — tax and employer benefits specialist with 10+ years in financial reporting and payroll tax strategy.
Find Out Your Number.
Free. No Pitch. Just Math.
Verified: CBIZ Advisors LLC (Aug 2025) · HitesmanLaw P.A. (May 2025)
$500K legal protection per enrolled employer · IRS Section 125 · Federal law since 1978